• SERVICES
    • DISC Behavioral Profiles for Sport
    • Research and Evaluation
    • Mediation
    • Negotiation Strategies & Advising
    • Strategic Planning
    • Sports Playbook Team Culture Model
    • Team Facilitation
  • KNOWLEDGE
    • Blog
    • SCI TV
    • Sports Performance Playbook
  • ABOUT
    • About
    • Media Queries
    • Privacy Policy
    • Team Members
    • Testimonials
  • CONTACT

  • SERVICES
    • DISC Behavioral Profiles for Sport
    • Research and Evaluation
    • Mediation
    • Negotiation Strategies & Advising
    • Strategic Planning
    • Sports Playbook Team Culture Model
    • Team Facilitation
  • KNOWLEDGE
    • Blog
    • SCI TV
    • Sports Performance Playbook
  • ABOUT
    • About
    • Media Queries
    • Privacy Policy
    • Team Members
    • Testimonials
  • CONTACT

DEALING WITH AN ANGRY PUBLIC IN SPORTS | PATRICK FIELD

In an episode of SCI TV, Patrick Field of the Consensus Building Institute discusses how to deal with stakeholder engagement in sports. Field is co-author of “Dealing With An Angry Public,” and he covers critical considerations in engaging key stakeholders in highly visible sports scenarios. Field highlights six key elements that help businesses and organizations negotiate, rather than fight, with critics.

Organizations Make Mistakes

From the BP Deepwater Horizon oil spill to the government response to Hurricane Katrina to nearly every new sports stadium, organizations often make many mistakes in stakeholder engagement. Field’s interest in public engagement stems from those failures and trying to answer the question, “why do things tend to go so badly?”

There are three major ways the public can feel concerned. 1) they can feel hurt by something already happened; 2) they can be offended by what is being planned; and 3) something happens that causes a conflict in values. All can create animosity and stifle the long term plans of an organization.

Legal and Promotional vs. Engagement

Field stresses that while organizations are most familiar with legal and promotional strategies to address these concerns, ultimately such strategies are not nearly as powerful as real public and stakeholder engagement.

“Big problems can be solved together if people can come around to the same side of the table,” said Field. “It’s a very deliberate approach that takes time and effort; it’s hard to do very quickly.”

There are six principles that “Dealing With An Angry Public” recommends for organizations working with stakeholders: acknowledge concerns, joint fact finding, contingent commitment, accept responsibility, act trustworthy, and focus on long term relationships. Together these steps can turn an adversarial relationship into a partnership.

Stakeholder Engagement in Sports

Field cites the NFL as not being able to implement these principles around the concussion issue, in the process creating a larger credibility issue with fans. Another current example of engagement missteps comes from the Boston 2024 Olympic bid, where flashy venue plans have been bogged down by skeptics, mistrust, and low public support. Organizations often try to market and promote their way out of a situation, and this is especially true in the sports industry.

True stakeholder engagement “takes commitment of leadership to do things differently, training of staff to think about things differently, people like us to help implement these strategies, and integrating this strategy with your public relations, political, or legal strategy.”

Follow Patrick Field’s work at the Consensus Building Institute here.

https://sportsconflict.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Dealing-with-An-Angry-Public-in-Sports-Patrick-Field.mp3

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Google Podcasts | RSS

Post navigation

QUICK POLL

How do you think conflicts in sports should be resolved?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

ABOUT SCI

Prepare for Optimal Performance™

The Sports Conflict Institute (SCI) provides innovative solutions to the inevitable barriers to success that sports organizations face both inside and outside the lines.

SCI serves as a confidential, high integrity provider with unmatched expertise in assessing, preventing, and resolving conflict and culture challenges that threaten to undercut the success of your team or organization.

SCI is as competitive as our clients and craves the challenge of rescuing seasons, solving vexing business problems, and serving as a trusted advisor when issues arise. SCI is on a mission to understand the early warning signs of trouble and help you prevent or mitigate the high costs of conflict.

POLL

How do you think conflicts in sports should be resolved?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
BLOG
Embracing Mediation in Football: FIFA Launches a New Conflict Resolution Service
Read More >
How Can I Change Conflict Into Collaboration?
Read More >
Why Is Trust So Difficult To Build?
Read More >
The Ugly Truth About The Beautiful Game
What Happened To The USMNT | The Ugly Truth About The Beautiful Game
Read More >
Not So Super League | Making Sense of It All
Read More >
TWITTER
Tweets by @Sportconflict

 

Sports Conflict Institute (SCI) © 2023