Following concerning incidents and recognizing potential systemic vulnerabilities, a major Division I athletics program engaged SCI for comprehensive cultural assessment. The proactive evaluation revealed critical gaps in reporting systems, student-athlete isolation, and policy awareness that, if unaddressed, could enable serious misconduct while leaving the institution exposed to significant liability.
Situation Overview
A prominent university athletics department with over 400 student-athletes across sixteen teams recognized the need for systematic cultural evaluation following several concerning incidents. While no crisis had erupted, leadership understood that reactive responses to individual incidents failed to address potential systemic issues. They engaged SCI to conduct comprehensive assessment examining student-athlete experience, departmental culture, and institutional safeguards against misconduct. The assessment would evaluate existing policies, reporting mechanisms, and cultural dynamics that could either prevent or enable harmful behaviors including hazing and sexual misconduct.
The Challenge
The department faced the complex challenge of understanding its true cultural landscape beneath surface-level compliance. While policies existed on paper, their actual implementation, awareness, and effectiveness remained unknown. The assessment needed to uncover whether protective systems functioned as intended or merely created false security through checkbox compliance.
Key Complexity Factors:
- Multiple reporting structures creating confusion and gaps
- Fear of retaliation preventing disclosure of concerns
- Student-athlete isolation fostering insular culture
- Inconsistent policy knowledge across teams and staff
Without comprehensive assessment, the department operated blindly, unable to distinguish between effective safeguards and dangerous vulnerabilities. The stakes included student safety, institutional liability, NCAA compliance, and the fundamental educational mission of collegiate athletics.
The SCI Approach
SCI implemented a multi-phase assessment combining document analysis, confidential interviews, and anonymous surveys to create comprehensive understanding of departmental culture and systemic vulnerabilities. The approach prioritized both breadth and depth, ensuring representative data while protecting participant confidentiality.
Implementation Methodology
Phase 1: Document Analysis & System Mapping
Comprehensive review of policies, procedures, handbooks, and reporting structures. Mapped existing systems against best practices, identifying gaps between documented procedures and actual implementation. Analyzed previous incident responses and investigation protocols.
Phase 2: Confidential Stakeholder Interviews
Conducted on-site interviews with representative sampling across all teams, including student-athletes from every sport and academic class. Interviewed coaches, administrators, and support staff using validated assessment instruments ensuring consistency while allowing authentic disclosure.
Phase 3: Anonymous Digital Survey
Deployed comprehensive surveys achieving over 50% student-athlete participation and 67% staff response rate. Mixed quantitative and qualitative questions revealed patterns invisible through interviews alone, particularly around sensitive topics where anonymity enabled honest disclosure.
Outcomes & Impact
The assessment revealed critical vulnerabilities requiring immediate attention while identifying strengths to build upon:
Only 11% of student-athletes viewed ombudsman office as trustworthy. 53% feared retaliation for reporting misconduct. Critical gaps in policy awareness with 33% only somewhat knowledgeable about definitions.
Student-athletes reported minimal interaction outside athletics community, creating insular culture vulnerable to groupthink and normalized misconduct. Over 54% of relationships within athletic bubble.
Complete reconstruction of ombudsman role to meet professional standards. Mandatory exit interviews for early warning system. Integration initiatives breaking down athletic isolation. Clear reporting protocols with multiple confidential channels.
The department immediately implemented priority recommendations, reconstructing reporting systems and launching comprehensive education initiatives. The assessment provided roadmap for cultural transformation, converting compliance checkbox into genuine protective infrastructure.
Strategic Insight
This assessment demonstrates that even well-intentioned athletic departments can harbor dangerous blind spots between policy and practice. The most significant vulnerabilities often hide in plain sight: ineffective reporting systems that no one trusts, isolation that breeds unhealthy cultures, and policies everyone knows exist but few understand. Proactive assessment before crisis provides the opportunity to strengthen protective systems when stakes are lower and options broader. The courage to look deeply at uncomfortable truths ultimately protects both student-athletes and institutions.
Related SCI Capabilities
This case exemplifies SCI’s integrated approach to sports conflict resolution. Learn more about our systematic methodologies:
Research and Evaluation
Comprehensive cultural assessment revealing hidden vulnerabilities
External Ombuds Services
Professional standards for confidential reporting and early intervention
Team Culture Assessment
Breaking down isolation and building healthy team dynamics
Strategic Planning
Converting assessment findings into actionable transformation strategies
Transform Conflict into Competitive Advantage
Every conflict contains opportunity. Let SCI’s systematic approach protect your performance and reputation.