Category Archives: Blog

NCAA Football Sportsmanship – Florida State & Oregon

At nearly the highest stage of NCAA College Football, Florida State and Oregon, two of the top teams in the country, showed the world that many of their team-members still need to pass NCAA Football Sportsmanship 101.  It began with Jameis Winston gradually becoming unglued in the 4th quarter as the game slipped to a point where a comeback was out of the question.  Winston’s coach, Jimbo Fisher finally had to get serious with him, saying, according to SBNation, “Jameis, if you don’t calm the f*** down, you’re going to the bench.”  To make matters worse, the video of this talk between them immediately went viral.  Luckily, Winston did seem to calm down.  He also redeemed himself a bit by going across the field and shaking hands with Oregon players at the end of the game, something that is commonplace sportsmanship in every league that I know of.  Unfortunately, about two-thirds of the Florida State team didn’t get the memo, as they went directly to their locker room instead of offering congratulations to Oregon.

Not Just Florida State, Oregon Too?

If I stopped the story there, it would just be Florida State who walked away with a tarnished image.  Unfortunately for the Ducks (and also for me writing this, as a two-time Oregon alumn and a fan) some players decided it would be a good idea to chant “no-means-no” in tune with the Florida State chant and tomahawk arm motion, which was a direct taunt to Jameis Winston, who had been facing sexual assault charges over the past few years.

Over 28 Million Viewers Witnessed Bad NCAA Football Sportsmanship.

For both teams the negative PR and reputation costs over this kind of behavior was magnified significantly, as according to Fox Sports, over 28 million viewers were watching the game.  For Oregon football in particular, their reputation this year behind Marcus Mariota’s character and leadership has been extraordinary, so it was quite unfortunate to see it blemished by the behavior of a few.  Further, I’m sure that Mark Helfrich and the Ducks organization would rather be 100% focused on preparing for the National Championship game than having to deal with any kind of damage control at this time.

Wrap Up.

In end of season, high-pressure, win-or-lose games, athletes can often end that game in one of two frames of mind: celebration or frustration.  In either case, the emotions present can be very strong and sometimes override their better judgment.  It is often a brilliant move by a coach to call a timeout, win-or-lose, prior to the end of a high-stakes game, to calm their athletes down and reinforce the tenets of their code of conduct and proper sportsmanship.  Team leaders also have a role in this, by not only modelling good behavior, but by reinforcing good behavior and correcting their teammates’ bad behavior immediately on-and-off the field of play.

In the upcoming National Championship Game you can bet on celebration and frustration making an appearance.  Whether or not either will manifest bad sportsmanship in the view of millions is up to each team to decide.

Author: Jeff Sather, MS

Tom Jernstedt of the College Football Playoff Selection Committee Shares Insights

In this episode of SCI TALK, we are joined by Tom Jernstedt of the College Football Playoff Selection Committee. He shares his fascinating experience with this historic change in NCAA Athletics along with insights from the past 40 years of overseeing college championships.

Listen to this episode of SCI Talk

About Mr. Jernstedt:

Former NCAA Executive Vice President

  • Served as senior-level executive, including executive vice president, deputy executive director and chief operating officer, throughout 38-year NCAA career (1972-2010).
  • Supervised NCAA Division I, II and III football, including NCAA Football Board of Directors, College Football Officiating LLC and Football Issues Committee.
  • Recruited by legendary football coach Len Casanova; four-year scholarship student-athlete, University of Oregon (1963-1967).

Current Occupation: Senior counselor, The Jernstedt Company.

Career Highlights:

  • Consultant, Mountain West Conference (2012-2013); Big 12 Conference (2010)
  • Oversaw development of 88 Division I, II and III men’s and women’s NCAA championships. Staff liaison to numerous external Association-related committees.
  • Directed all facets of NCAA basketball, increasing multi-year television contract revenue from $1.2 million (1972) to $10.8 billion (2010).
  • Led various internal functional groups: administration and finance, championships and event management, communications, membership services, public affairs, branding and promotions, broadcasting and corporate alliances.
  • Facilitated NCAA governance plan that incorporated women’s championships into NCAA structure (late 1970′s).
  • Indianapolis Super Bowl Host Committee, Board of Directors (2009-2012).
  • National Football Foundation, Legacy Award (2010).
  • National Collegiate Basketball Hall of Fame, Inductee (2010).
  • USA Basketball, Edward S. Steitz Award (2010).
  • Naismith Memorial Basketball Hall of Fame, John Bunn Award (2001).
  • USA Basketball, Board of Directors (1976-2010), President (2000-2005); United States Olympic Committee, Board of Directors (1974-2002).
  • Naismith Memorial Basketball Hall of Fame, Board of Trustees (1989-2010).
  • US Collegiate Sports Council, Board of Directors (1987-2010), VP (2004-2010).
  • Held three athletic administrative positions at University of Oregon (1969-1972).

Education:

  • Bachelor’s degree in political science, University of Oregon (1967).
  • Master’s degree in education, University of Oregon (1973).

Meaning In Sports: Why I Still Run

I have been running since sixth grade. At times casual and others fiercely competitive, running is far and away the sport I am closest to. It has shaped my daily routine, circles of friends, and the meaning I see in my own life for many years. For everything I have given the sport, it has given back more. What follows is a brief insight to why I still run today.

Exploration

Most sports can take you places, but running is unique in its power to explore. Since I was young I have been fascinated with maps of all sorts, and running has been a way to put feet to paper, exploring the blank spots and looking around the next corner. Whether it’s linking neighborhoods and country roads to forge a new route or tracing the spine of a mountain range halfway around the world, moving with your own two feet is liberating and primal, each new path discovering another. Since moving to Oregon I’ve scoured over more than my share of maps and tried to put the miles where my imagination is. The result is a growing passion for mountain running.

In high school and college the running and racing cycle has a comforting predictability. Summer training, fall cross country—break—winter training, spring track—break—repeat. After college, there are no rules or cycles, only a vast new world of distances, terrain, events, and fastest known times, all flowing from simply following your feet. My focus this year was on short course mountain races, usually a marathon or less featuring significant elevation gain over a variety of surfaces. My training for these events varied from multi-mile long hill repeats, to track intervals, to alpine ski touring, to suffocating treadmill sessions. I try to follow the wisdom that variety is superior to monotony, that something new keeps the body fresh and the mind hungry. This year I ran and raced in Oregon, New Hampshire, Montana, Colorado, and California.

Competitiveness

If you are anxious for your next race or adventure, I probably don’t have to explain why a fire in the belly needs to be fed. Someone once told me that when you’re truly satisfied with your effort it’s time to retire. With that logic, most of us still have waters to test. This past year I ran my first road marathon, mountain championships, and ultra marathon; next year I want to run faster at those distances, see how I measure against the best mountain specialists, and maybe attempt 50 miles. But even without races, sometimes you just want to feel fast and confident, like on a desert mountain run this past summer:

My legs started waking up in the cool air, and with gravel underfoot I felt the roll. Rain drops began falling, triggering the vibrant smell from an ocean of sage. I passed the five mile mark in less than 28 minutes and felt my mojo creep back. Exiting the pine filled canyon, the road spilled out to the wide open, a big swirling sky overhead. Of all songs, Call Me Maybe jumped into my head and suddenly a race was on with no one but myself. The final mile was not marked, but no matter. I was crushing it. Whether in SW Montana, the bluffs of Decorah, Iowa, or the Oregon desert, I knew and loved this feeling, the invincibility and sheer giddiness racing through every muscle. I tossed my water bottle aside and flat out sprinted the final two hundred meters to the car.

Camaraderie

Finally, camaraderie through running is what kept my wheels turning in high school, college and continues to spur me today. Following the performances and endeavors of former teammates and new friends continually inspires and redefines possible. Whether it’s my college training buddy Matthew Busche pushing the peloton across the French countryside, grad school accomplice Andrew Wagner flowing over iconic mountain ridgelines, or SCI’s founder and my friend Josh Gordon helping his team to the US Club Cross Country Masters Title, there is a constant stream of endeavors to root for that give hope to our own dreams. When your friends and training partners have breakthroughs it makes you wonder, why not me?

Beyond the motivation we draw from friends, there has always been something special about simply sharing the miles and training hours with those closest. One of my favorite quotes was given to me by my college cross country coach Steve Pasche at the conclusion of a difficult but eye opening freshman season. It comes from Aussie distance great Ron Clarke: “To some happiness is a warm puppy or a cold beer, but to me happiness is running in the hills with my mates around me.” Seeking new places and challenges still fuels much of my running, but if I had to choose, I would keep going just for my mates. In the spirit of camaraderie through sport we can all find meaning.

Author: David McKay

Athlete Philanthropy | Harrie Bakst of Weinstein Carnegie Philanthropic Group

In this episode of SCI Talk, we explore Athlete Philanthropy in the world of professional sports with Harrie Bakst of Weinstein Carnegie Philanthropic Group. He discusses the issues and controversies surrounding athlete philanthropy and suggests effective ways for athletes to foster a strong philanthropic organization, while avoiding the many potholes that inevitably present themselves in such projects.

Listen Now: SCI TALK (Athlete Philanthropy; Harrie Bakst of Weinstein Carnegie Philanthropic Group)

About Harrie Bakst:

Harrie’s remarkable story is highlighted in A Race Like No Other (Harper Collins) by The New York Times sportswriter Liz Robbins, where he overcame cancer, started WCPG, and ran the New York City Marathon a mere 5 months after his 33rd and final treatment. He also serves on a number of boards and committees including Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, The Ulman Cancer Fund for Young Adults, UJA Federation of New York’s Young Entertainment Committee, Switch2Health’s Board of Advisors, and served as chair of Right To Play’s Young Board of Trustees. Harrie was born in New York City (from the only borough worthy of a “The” in front of it), and is a graduate with Magna Cum Laude honors from New York University, where he was presented the Allie Sherman Business Leadership Award & the President’s Service Award. Harrie was also named by Partnership Activation as one of forty-eight Rising Stars in the sports and entertainment industries in addition to being listed as a top executive under 30-years old by under30CEO.com. He continues to compete in marathons and triathlons raising money and awareness for cancer research.

Harrie currently resides in Manhattan with his wife Amy, and is cancer free.

Exploring An Ombuds Function for NCAA Intercollegiate Athletics

In this episode, SCI Founder Joshua Gordon and Dr. Ken Pendleton discuss the value and need for an improved intercollegiate ombuds model. SCI is a major proponent of having a dedicated ombudsman available to student athletes and the outlet it provides to avoid major issues or conflict in NCAA college athletics.

Listen

College Sports Ombuds?

Intercollegiate sports have provided success stories, fan excitement, substantial college revenues, and character building experiences to many young athletes.  However, when I look at the news with each passing month, it is obvious that there are a wide range of systemic problems present that are not getting any better with time.  Institutions break league rules and we only see the few that get caught; coaches may receive exemplary marks on performance and later be found to be running shocking and abusive programs; and athlete off-the-field performance has been highlighted by extreme cases of misconduct which have included nightmarish hazing cultures, rape, and murder.

With these issues present, why aren’t all institutions making moves to proactively create Ombuds Offices, especially those specialized to deal with athletics issues?  Obviously, it takes time, commitment, and buy-in at a variety of levels within a university to take a step like this.  However, if most institutions really wanted to create specialized Ombuds Offices, they definitely could.  So, why aren’t more of them at least making moves toward this goal?  Do they think that the cost is too great to staff an Ombudsman or are they perhaps fearful of having an outside consultant or an Ombudsman around?

Is It Money Or Fear?

Obviously every institution is different.  As far as cost is concerned, it’s tough to calculate the exact cost savings of an Ombuds Program, as you can’t calculate the cost of a calamity that didn’t happen because it was averted by having an Ombudsman.  Regardless, there have been studies that show significant return on investment created by Ombuds Programs.  However, if I were to take a guess, I don’t think money is the issue at all, as most NCAA schools should know by now that the cost of one major conflict can be worth an Ombudsman’s yearly salary one hundred times over.  Instead, I would have to say that most programs don’t fully understand the benefits of having an Ombudsman, and from history we all know that people generally fear what they do not understand.  They also may see the addition of an Ombudsman as a loss of control.  For example, when an outside evaluator comes in to evaluate a program, there is generally something called “evaluator anxiety” that is experienced.  Staff and executives wonder if they are being judged and if their positions will be at risk after a “nosy” evaluator makes their report.  Likewise, perhaps some Athletics Personnel think an Ombudsman may scrutinize their actions and pose a threat to their positions. This is definitely the wrong way to think about an Ombudsman though.

Ombuds Protect Athletics Personnel From Making Mistakes

Athletics Personnel must see the Ombudsman as a resource and even a way to protect them from making costly mistakes.  For instance, if an athlete comes to a coach about a problem they are experiencing, the coach is now put on notice and has the weight of making the right chain of decisions to see that this problem is resolved properly or brought to the right audience.  Perhaps the institution already has a wonderfully designed system for dealing with conflict.  Bravo!  However, every situation is different, complaints can be indirect or ambiguous at times, and coaches and other staff may either not have the time to deal with them or lack the expertise needed to do so.  On the other hand, if a complaint is brought to an Ombudsman, the coach is not put on notice and does not bear the weight of now making the right chain of decisions to see that the complaint is given the right attention.  Thus, you have a professional office now dealing with the complaint, which can save a coach, staff member, or athletic director from getting in the stressful position of knowing that a single mistake in their handling of a complaint might later put them in the hot seat.  If you look at it this way, having an Ombudsman around helps most members of the Athletic Department protect themselves from making damning errors in the process of dealing with conflicts.

Ombuds Benefit Everyone

Overall, an Ombudsman is a resource for all stakeholders, is confidential, impartial, and can provide a university with continued non-attributable reports on the issues dealt with, so that decision makers can correct systemic areas of concern and create new policies and procedures designed to mitigate or resolve those concerns.  So, again, why aren’t all NCAA schools actively looking to create Ombuds Offices?  I believe it can be summed up with one word, “fear.”  This is a fear of the unknown and unfamiliar Ombudsman and a fear of not having absolute control over problems that arise.  However, I would argue that having a third party to take the lead in conflict should be thought of by decision makers as a godsend.  Not only can an Ombudsman protect them from making costly mistakes in dealing with conflict, they can also help alleviate much of the stress that regular conflicts place on athletics personnel, freeing them up to focus more time on other aspects of their jobs.  Thus, while much of the talk about Ombuds programs focuses on protecting athletes, decision makers must also realize that Ombuds programs are a benefit to everyone, including themselves.

Getting Past Fear And Being Proactive

No program is immune from conflict.  Even the best managed programs have occasional problems that make the evening news.  With the issues present in Intercollegiate Athletics today, institutions must press for proactive, continual improvements through regular assessment and employment of conflict-trained personnel such as Ombudsmen.  Decision makers need to look around and realize that if they are not proactively seeking help to take regular, measured, strategic, and knowledgeable steps toward mitigating and managing conflict within their programs, they are failing to protect the entire student body, the staff, the university they represent, and ultimately themselves.  Hopefully more NCAA programs will begin to realize that these risks are reason enough to get over their fears and begin taking steps to create an Ombuds Office at their university.

Author: Jeff Sather

The Oregonian’s Connor Letourneau on NCAA College Basketball

In this episode of SCI Talk, we explore College Basketball with Connor Letourneau of The Oregonian. He discusses the issues and controversies surrounding college basketball today, and suggests methods that can be implemented to cultivate a more conducive environment for the student-athlete.

Conversation with NBA Expert Steve Kyler

In this episode of SCI Talk, we explore the NBA with Steve Kyler of Basketball Insiders. He discusses issues and perspectives concerning the NBA, and some of the developing ideas and concepts that are in place to help the game progress.

Listen Now

Follow Steve on Twitter @stevekylerNBA

Event Management: Plan for the Worst

When managing an event, organizers must always be wary of one very crucial detail, Murphy’s Law is in effect.  No matter how well you plan, there is always a chance for a fiasco.  In a February 2014 episode of SCI TV, SCI founder Joshua Gordon, asked Gil Fried, a professor at the University of New Haven Sports Management Department and the Executive Director of Patron Management, “how do you protect a sport when the arena isn’t just an arena, but is 26.2 miles long?”  His question was in reference to protecting spectators and participants at the Boston Marathon from further terrorist attacks.  Professor Fried answered that “you can never guarantee perfect safety.”  He also stated that “if people really wanted to attack, they’d attack.”  Fried was not saying that “reasonable safety” was impossible, but was simple stating that “perfect safety” is not a guarantee.  Thus, there is always a chance for a disaster, whether you are talking about a safety disaster or any other type of disaster that could happen at a large event.  I don’t mean that you shouldn’t do everything possible to mitigate the chances of disasters, calamities, problems, and conflicts.  You should.  However, you should also expect that your planning will never perfectly end such occurrences from happening.  Therefore, event management personnel should always have a plan for dealing with conflicts appropriately when they do occur.

A Local Event

As a small, but amusing example, I can offer up my experience as a participant in last year’s Thanksgiving Day 5k road race in Springfield, Oregon, The Turkey Stuffer.  If you grew up in the Eugene/Springfield area, as I did, and were a local runner, odds are that at some point you may have raced a 5k in freezing conditions, a torrential downpour, or dense fog on Thanksgiving morning at least a time or two.   On Thanksgiving morning of 2013 I was feeling good and was ready to run hard at the Turkey Stuffer before then stuffing myself with food for the remainder of the day.   After I warmed up for the race and got to start line, I noticed no less than ten very good local runners up front, many of whom I trained with from time to time.  “This is great, we’re going to battle it out today and end up pushing each other to run some fast times,” I thought.  The gun went off and we were gone.  A group of about 10 to 12 of us immediately went to the front and began pushing the pace with another 1200 or so people in tow behind us.

Event Management Gone Wrong

The race goes through a maze of streets, so it’s very important that the course is marked well and that there are trained course officials at the turns (hint, hint).  This time however, someone didn’t seem to think this issue was of great importance, as just over a mile into the race, we were pointed down the wrong street by a course official.  Up front, a few of us began to realize that something was wrong, and you could feel a bit of uneasiness beginning to creep into each stride.  All of sudden, someone finally shouted, “are we going the wrong way?”  At once, everyone started to groan.  Then some obscenities were yelled and a sudden stop finally occurred.  A few of the top runners in the field didn’t even try to turn around and get back on course, they just gave up.  As for the rest of us, we turned around to find 1200 plus people running straight at us.  We began running toward them and motioning for them to turn around.  The whole fiasco reminded me of the parade scene from the movie “Animal House.”  It was complete pandemonium and people seemed to be running in all directions, jumping over shrubs, running into one another and making a mad dash to get back to the right course.  One person I know decided to just walk over to a point in the race where the course doubles back on itself and rejoin it in the place he thought he ought to be in (of course he cut a full mile off of the course by doing this).  Others of us ended up running a 5k that was just over 3.5 miles (according to a friend’s GPS watch) instead of the 3.1 miles that we were expecting to race.  The further up front you were, the longer you ended up running, so our quest to push each other for a fast time was ruined.

Managing the Mistake

At least it wasn’t the Olympics, only a local road race.  However, there were still some upset individuals out there who drove across town early in the morning and paid money to take part in what they thought was an organized race.  Fiascos do happen though.  In a case such as this, there is no way that a race director could tell all of the participants to get back on the line for a “redo.”  What was done was done.  You can’t fix it.  However, you can make sure that you relay the right message to the participants.  A simple email to individuals or a notice on the Parks and Recreation District website, that thanked participants for coming out and then apologized to them for the mishap, with a promise to correct the problem for next year, would have been plenty good to everyone there.  Instead, I never even saw a single acknowledgement of the incident.  There was only a post on their Facebook page, which basically said “thanks for coming out.”  Further, I felt sorry for the race timer as he received most of the direct complaints, yet, to my knowledge he was only hired to do the timing, not to layout and manage the course.

Cost of Failed Event Management

Although it was a memorable experience, it is not one that I would like to repeat in future races and I wouldn’t be surprised if a good number of the people from that race will think twice about running it again this year.  Overall, the moral of this story is that in any event the planning must also include a plan for dealing with calamities, disasters, or other problems that may still arise.  Hopefully an event is managed so well that 99.9% of these issues are mitigated.  However, Murphy’s Law is always in effect.  So, create a plan that mitigates issues from happening, but also creates protocol for dealing with those issues, should they happen regardless of your best efforts.  From this example, all that was needed was for event management to acknowledge the issue, apologize to the participants, and make amends by promising to fix the problem for next year.  This would have been an effective apology that was also simple to disseminate to participants.  Instead, a fun local road race called The Turkey Stuffer is now known to many local runners by another nickname, “The Cluster F***er.”

In all, not handling the mistake properly might cost the race some future participants, and hurt it’s reputation, but in reality this probably won’t result in a large loss to the event, as it was only a small race to begin with.  However, what if the same thing happened in a major marathon that offered prize money, had $150 entry fees, and hosted over 50,000 participants, paying around a thousand bucks each in travel and lodging costs to be there?  Handling the mistake properly would now seem to be exponentially more difficult.  Further, failure to handle the mistake in a proper and timely manner could result in a loss of reputation and large future losses to the event.

Mistakes like this happen more often that you would think, as the news is littered with stories from events that went awry.  Strongly incorporating conflict management into event planning is not only a smart thing to do, but I believe that Murphy’s Law also makes it an absolute necessity.

Author: Jeff Sather